<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are there any man made objects on the moon viewable from the Hubble space telescope ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/are-there-any-man-made-objects-on-the-moon-viewable-from-the-hubble-space-telescope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/are-there-any-man-made-objects-on-the-moon-viewable-from-the-hubble-space-telescope/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: digquickly</title>
		<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/are-there-any-man-made-objects-on-the-moon-viewable-from-the-hubble-space-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-2405</link>
		<dc:creator>digquickly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/are-there-any-man-made-objects-on-the-moon-viewable-from-the-hubble-space-telescope/#comment-2405</guid>
		<description>No the Hubble Telescope doesn't have the resolution but NASA has returned high-def pictures of all 5 Apollo landing sites.  You can see man made structures plus astronaut foot paths.  See below.&lt;a href="http://www.proofficesupply.com/quill-office-supply.htm"&gt; digquickly&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No the Hubble Telescope doesn&#8217;t have the resolution but NASA has returned high-def pictures of all 5 Apollo landing sites.  You can see man made structures plus astronaut foot paths.  See below.<a href="http://www.proofficesupply.com/quill-office-supply.htm"> digquickly</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hammster</title>
		<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/are-there-any-man-made-objects-on-the-moon-viewable-from-the-hubble-space-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-2404</link>
		<dc:creator>hammster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 03:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/are-there-any-man-made-objects-on-the-moon-viewable-from-the-hubble-space-telescope/#comment-2404</guid>
		<description>No, but an alien-made object was found on the moon of Mars by the Mars Orbiter, and an astronaut recently told the world about it on national tv.

Don't believe me?  Watch it for yourself.  I swear this is true.&lt;a href="http://www.greattoolsusa.com/office-carts-4409"&gt; hammster&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, but an alien-made object was found on the moon of Mars by the Mars Orbiter, and an astronaut recently told the world about it on national tv.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t believe me?  Watch it for yourself.  I swear this is true.<a href="http://www.greattoolsusa.com/office-carts-4409"> hammster</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morningfox</title>
		<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/are-there-any-man-made-objects-on-the-moon-viewable-from-the-hubble-space-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-2403</link>
		<dc:creator>Morningfox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/are-there-any-man-made-objects-on-the-moon-viewable-from-the-hubble-space-telescope/#comment-2403</guid>
		<description>Nope, there are none.  Why do you think there should be?  Have you calculated how big something would have to be, for the Hubble to see it?  An object would need to be at least 400 feet in diameter, and even then it would be just a dot or two in the pictures.  The biggest piece of left-behind Apollo equipment is only 30 feet across and thus smaller than a single pixel in a Hubble image.

The Hubble's resolution is about 0.1 arc-seconds.

Satellites going around the moon have taken pictures of the Apollo equipment.&lt;a href="http://www.greattoolsusa.com/saw-accessories-4325"&gt; Morningfox&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, there are none.  Why do you think there should be?  Have you calculated how big something would have to be, for the Hubble to see it?  An object would need to be at least 400 feet in diameter, and even then it would be just a dot or two in the pictures.  The biggest piece of left-behind Apollo equipment is only 30 feet across and thus smaller than a single pixel in a Hubble image.</p>
<p>The Hubble&#8217;s resolution is about 0.1 arc-seconds.</p>
<p>Satellites going around the moon have taken pictures of the Apollo equipment.<a href="http://www.greattoolsusa.com/saw-accessories-4325"> Morningfox</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

