<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could you see men on the Moon with a telescope bought at the mall?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/could-you-see-men-on-the-moon-with-a-telescope-bought-at-the-mall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/could-you-see-men-on-the-moon-with-a-telescope-bought-at-the-mall/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 19:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: oddly amusing</title>
		<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/could-you-see-men-on-the-moon-with-a-telescope-bought-at-the-mall/comment-page-1/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>oddly amusing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 06:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/could-you-see-men-on-the-moon-with-a-telescope-bought-at-the-mall/#comment-263</guid>
		<description>it depends on your definition on inexpensive
according to my definition, it is not possible to see men on the moon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it depends on your definition on inexpensive<br />
according to my definition, it is not possible to see men on the moon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davehuckleberry_55</title>
		<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/could-you-see-men-on-the-moon-with-a-telescope-bought-at-the-mall/comment-page-1/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>davehuckleberry_55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 03:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/could-you-see-men-on-the-moon-with-a-telescope-bought-at-the-mall/#comment-262</guid>
		<description>You would have to have quite a powerful telescope to see a person standing a 1/4 of a million miles away.  I heard last week of one person who used his telescope to see the Japanese &#038; Chinese  satellites that are now orbiting the Moon so we must assume that it would be possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would have to have quite a powerful telescope to see a person standing a 1/4 of a million miles away.  I heard last week of one person who used his telescope to see the Japanese &#038; Chinese  satellites that are now orbiting the Moon so we must assume that it would be possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astronomer Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/could-you-see-men-on-the-moon-with-a-telescope-bought-at-the-mall/comment-page-1/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Astronomer Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/could-you-see-men-on-the-moon-with-a-telescope-bought-at-the-mall/#comment-261</guid>
		<description>I'm assuming you're going to try and spot moving objects on the moon..?  Well, I'd like to try that out sometime too.
Unfortunately, No, Even our advanced telescopes which you Can't buy at the mall won't provide us with a detailed image. The only way to do what you're trying to is by hovering above the moon itself, because only from there will you be able to see people walking around (with advanced telescopes - distances are still great).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m assuming you&#8217;re going to try and spot moving objects on the moon..?  Well, I&#8217;d like to try that out sometime too.<br />
Unfortunately, No, Even our advanced telescopes which you Can&#8217;t buy at the mall won&#8217;t provide us with a detailed image. The only way to do what you&#8217;re trying to is by hovering above the moon itself, because only from there will you be able to see people walking around (with advanced telescopes - distances are still great).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Patches</title>
		<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/could-you-see-men-on-the-moon-with-a-telescope-bought-at-the-mall/comment-page-1/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>James Patches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/could-you-see-men-on-the-moon-with-a-telescope-bought-at-the-mall/#comment-260</guid>
		<description>haha unfortunatly . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . yes. And i say unfortunately because there are no men on the moon :D lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha unfortunatly . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . yes. And i say unfortunately because there are no men on the moon <img src='http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpaceRikk</title>
		<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/could-you-see-men-on-the-moon-with-a-telescope-bought-at-the-mall/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>SpaceRikk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/could-you-see-men-on-the-moon-with-a-telescope-bought-at-the-mall/#comment-259</guid>
		<description>we need the hawaii or hubble space telescope. they announced last week they will send spitzer to take photos of what the men left behind in a year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we need the hawaii or hubble space telescope. they announced last week they will send spitzer to take photos of what the men left behind in a year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tick tock</title>
		<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/could-you-see-men-on-the-moon-with-a-telescope-bought-at-the-mall/comment-page-1/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>tick tock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/could-you-see-men-on-the-moon-with-a-telescope-bought-at-the-mall/#comment-258</guid>
		<description>the Moon subtends a half a degree and is 2000 miles wide.

thats like seeing every tiny one horse town from LA to NYC on a fold-out map 3 ft wide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the Moon subtends a half a degree and is 2000 miles wide.</p>
<p>thats like seeing every tiny one horse town from LA to NYC on a fold-out map 3 ft wide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcno02</title>
		<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/could-you-see-men-on-the-moon-with-a-telescope-bought-at-the-mall/comment-page-1/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>dcno02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 01:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/could-you-see-men-on-the-moon-with-a-telescope-bought-at-the-mall/#comment-257</guid>
		<description>no, you would need the Hubble Space Telescope to see something that small 240,000 miles away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no, you would need the Hubble Space Telescope to see something that small 240,000 miles away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave M</title>
		<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/could-you-see-men-on-the-moon-with-a-telescope-bought-at-the-mall/comment-page-1/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 02:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/could-you-see-men-on-the-moon-with-a-telescope-bought-at-the-mall/#comment-256</guid>
		<description>Humans on the moon would be far too small.

The Hubble Space Telescope can resolve features on the moon that are about the size of a football field.  (That's a single pixel).  

I'm not going to do the math, but I'd imagine an earthbound telescope would have to have a lens diameter of a few milometers to resolve something the size of a human at the distance of the moon....

They don't sell those at any of the malls in my neighborhood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Humans on the moon would be far too small.</p>
<p>The Hubble Space Telescope can resolve features on the moon that are about the size of a football field.  (That&#8217;s a single pixel).  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to do the math, but I&#8217;d imagine an earthbound telescope would have to have a lens diameter of a few milometers to resolve something the size of a human at the distance of the moon&#8230;.</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t sell those at any of the malls in my neighborhood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xyzpdqfoo</title>
		<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/could-you-see-men-on-the-moon-with-a-telescope-bought-at-the-mall/comment-page-1/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>xyzpdqfoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/could-you-see-men-on-the-moon-with-a-telescope-bought-at-the-mall/#comment-255</guid>
		<description>Nope.  The smallest feature a typical telescope can resolve is something like a mile across.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope.  The smallest feature a typical telescope can resolve is something like a mile across.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n2s.astronomy</title>
		<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/could-you-see-men-on-the-moon-with-a-telescope-bought-at-the-mall/comment-page-1/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>n2s.astronomy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/could-you-see-men-on-the-moon-with-a-telescope-bought-at-the-mall/#comment-254</guid>
		<description>No.  No current telescope is capable of resolving such a small target from so great a distance.  Even Hubble, working above the atmosphere, cannot resolve anything smaller then about a football field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.  No current telescope is capable of resolving such a small target from so great a distance.  Even Hubble, working above the atmosphere, cannot resolve anything smaller then about a football field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

