<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How important are precision optics in a home-built Dobsonian telescope?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/how-important-are-precision-optics-in-a-home-built-dobsonian-telescope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/how-important-are-precision-optics-in-a-home-built-dobsonian-telescope/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 20:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: minuteblue</title>
		<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/how-important-are-precision-optics-in-a-home-built-dobsonian-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-1017</link>
		<dc:creator>minuteblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/how-important-are-precision-optics-in-a-home-built-dobsonian-telescope/#comment-1017</guid>
		<description>You may want to look on, I occasionally see some mirrors made by R.F. Royce on there, which are supposed to be very high quality.

You can also look on in the classifieds for used (but pristine) mirrors.

I think a mirror from any fairly reputable company would be okay. Most people can't afford the super "high quality" mirrors and to be honest, the atmospheric conditions don't allow most telescopes to perform to their full potential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may want to look on, I occasionally see some mirrors made by R.F. Royce on there, which are supposed to be very high quality.</p>
<p>You can also look on in the classifieds for used (but pristine) mirrors.</p>
<p>I think a mirror from any fairly reputable company would be okay. Most people can&#8217;t afford the super &#8220;high quality&#8221; mirrors and to be honest, the atmospheric conditions don&#8217;t allow most telescopes to perform to their full potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: injanier</title>
		<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/how-important-are-precision-optics-in-a-home-built-dobsonian-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-1016</link>
		<dc:creator>injanier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 05:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/how-important-are-precision-optics-in-a-home-built-dobsonian-telescope/#comment-1016</guid>
		<description>A telescope is only as good as its weakest link, so you can't make up for a bad primary with better eyepieces. The quality of the mirror will show up in subtle, low contrast details, like features on Jupiter and Mars, or texture in nebulae. Because premium optics scatter less light, you will also be able to see just a tiny bit deeper. 

However, you're talking about paying twice as much or more for a mirror that is maybe 10% better.  The difference is very subtle in most situations. If you had the two mirrors side-by-side and the sky conditions were very good, you'd be able to pick the winner.  But  those Chinese mirrors are mostly well made, and will perform just fine. 

Get the premium mirror if money's no object, or if you have to have the very best. Otherwise, I think you'll be happy with the Chinese mirror. I have a Taiwanese (Guan Sheng) mirror and it works great.

But do be sure you're buying a good quality, diffraction-limited paraboloid, and that you can exchange it if you get a lemon. There are some dubious goods being offered for sale on eBay and other places.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A telescope is only as good as its weakest link, so you can&#8217;t make up for a bad primary with better eyepieces. The quality of the mirror will show up in subtle, low contrast details, like features on Jupiter and Mars, or texture in nebulae. Because premium optics scatter less light, you will also be able to see just a tiny bit deeper. </p>
<p>However, you&#8217;re talking about paying twice as much or more for a mirror that is maybe 10% better.  The difference is very subtle in most situations. If you had the two mirrors side-by-side and the sky conditions were very good, you&#8217;d be able to pick the winner.  But  those Chinese mirrors are mostly well made, and will perform just fine. </p>
<p>Get the premium mirror if money&#8217;s no object, or if you have to have the very best. Otherwise, I think you&#8217;ll be happy with the Chinese mirror. I have a Taiwanese (Guan Sheng) mirror and it works great.</p>
<p>But do be sure you&#8217;re buying a good quality, diffraction-limited paraboloid, and that you can exchange it if you get a lemon. There are some dubious goods being offered for sale on eBay and other places.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith P</title>
		<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/how-important-are-precision-optics-in-a-home-built-dobsonian-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-1015</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 06:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/how-important-are-precision-optics-in-a-home-built-dobsonian-telescope/#comment-1015</guid>
		<description>You need to get to 1/8 wave or better for "diffraction limited" performance, which means that the optical surface is no longer the "weak link" in image quality. If your Chinese mirror is 1/8 wave or better, the cost difference will be decisive.

The only other thing to be concerned about is the reflective coating: aluminum or silver? Nowadays almost everyone uses aluminum, which is fairly permanent. Silver is more expensive and tarninshes, but it does reflect better when the quality is good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to get to 1/8 wave or better for &#8220;diffraction limited&#8221; performance, which means that the optical surface is no longer the &#8220;weak link&#8221; in image quality. If your Chinese mirror is 1/8 wave or better, the cost difference will be decisive.</p>
<p>The only other thing to be concerned about is the reflective coating: aluminum or silver? Nowadays almost everyone uses aluminum, which is fairly permanent. Silver is more expensive and tarninshes, but it does reflect better when the quality is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

