<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is there really much of a difference between an 8 inch and 10 inch telescope?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/is-there-really-much-of-a-difference-between-an-8-inch-and-10-inch-telescope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/is-there-really-much-of-a-difference-between-an-8-inch-and-10-inch-telescope/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 20:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: tham153</title>
		<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/is-there-really-much-of-a-difference-between-an-8-inch-and-10-inch-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-1556</link>
		<dc:creator>tham153</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/is-there-really-much-of-a-difference-between-an-8-inch-and-10-inch-telescope/#comment-1556</guid>
		<description>The light gathering power of a telescope depends on the square of the diameter.  Thus the two you mention are in the ratio of 64:100 in light gathering.
If you can afford it, and have a decent location from which to observe, I would go with the 10 inch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The light gathering power of a telescope depends on the square of the diameter.  Thus the two you mention are in the ratio of 64:100 in light gathering.<br />
If you can afford it, and have a decent location from which to observe, I would go with the 10 inch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zahbudar</title>
		<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/is-there-really-much-of-a-difference-between-an-8-inch-and-10-inch-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-1555</link>
		<dc:creator>zahbudar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/is-there-really-much-of-a-difference-between-an-8-inch-and-10-inch-telescope/#comment-1555</guid>
		<description>Well to be quite honest with you, the difference is not in the
diameter of the mirror, but in the square inches of surface area
that the mirror has for light gathering...

An 8 Inch Mirror has a radius of 4 inches. The area of a circle 
with a radius of 4 inches is Pi x R Squared = 3.14 x 4 x 4 =
roughly 50 square inches.

A 10 Inch Mirror has a radius of 5 inches. The area of a circle
with a radius of 5 inches is Pi x R Squared = 3.14 x 5 x 5 =
78.5 square inches.

If you will look at those numbers carefully you will see that the 10
Inch mirror has half again as much light gathering capability 
(square inches of mirror surface) as the 8 Inch Mirror. That is very
significant when it comes to loking at things that are many light years
away from you, the observer. 

Also, you will not have a serious case of aperature fever until you begin dreaming of 22, 24, and 28 Inch mirror models...Then it gets really crazy. do the math and see what giant increases in area of the mirror  come along with mirrors that size... for example: a 22 Inch mirror has 37,994 square inches of mirror surface... That is about 700 times the light gathering capability of your 8 incher...

Cheers,
Zah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well to be quite honest with you, the difference is not in the<br />
diameter of the mirror, but in the square inches of surface area<br />
that the mirror has for light gathering&#8230;</p>
<p>An 8 Inch Mirror has a radius of 4 inches. The area of a circle<br />
with a radius of 4 inches is Pi x R Squared = 3.14 x 4 x 4 =<br />
roughly 50 square inches.</p>
<p>A 10 Inch Mirror has a radius of 5 inches. The area of a circle<br />
with a radius of 5 inches is Pi x R Squared = 3.14 x 5 x 5 =<br />
78.5 square inches.</p>
<p>If you will look at those numbers carefully you will see that the 10<br />
Inch mirror has half again as much light gathering capability<br />
(square inches of mirror surface) as the 8 Inch Mirror. That is very<br />
significant when it comes to loking at things that are many light years<br />
away from you, the observer. </p>
<p>Also, you will not have a serious case of aperature fever until you begin dreaming of 22, 24, and 28 Inch mirror models&#8230;Then it gets really crazy. do the math and see what giant increases in area of the mirror  come along with mirrors that size&#8230; for example: a 22 Inch mirror has 37,994 square inches of mirror surface&#8230; That is about 700 times the light gathering capability of your 8 incher&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Zah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tina L</title>
		<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/is-there-really-much-of-a-difference-between-an-8-inch-and-10-inch-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-1554</link>
		<dc:creator>Tina L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/is-there-really-much-of-a-difference-between-an-8-inch-and-10-inch-telescope/#comment-1554</guid>
		<description>the best answer may be to have a look and see for yourself.

the 10 inch will certainly do better on faint fuzzies. however, it is a larger piece of equipment, and hauling it around will be a different experience.

all other things being equal, i'd go for the 10 inch. but i am also physically capable of doing so, and have a vehicle to transport it in. my biggest scope is an 18 inch. i carry it around in my van. it's really cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the best answer may be to have a look and see for yourself.</p>
<p>the 10 inch will certainly do better on faint fuzzies. however, it is a larger piece of equipment, and hauling it around will be a different experience.</p>
<p>all other things being equal, i&#8217;d go for the 10 inch. but i am also physically capable of doing so, and have a vehicle to transport it in. my biggest scope is an 18 inch. i carry it around in my van. it&#8217;s really cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lainey</title>
		<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/is-there-really-much-of-a-difference-between-an-8-inch-and-10-inch-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-1553</link>
		<dc:creator>Lainey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/is-there-really-much-of-a-difference-between-an-8-inch-and-10-inch-telescope/#comment-1553</guid>
		<description>No there is not a huge difference. You should save some more if you want to upgrade and make it worth while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No there is not a huge difference. You should save some more if you want to upgrade and make it worth while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Lazy Astronomer</title>
		<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/is-there-really-much-of-a-difference-between-an-8-inch-and-10-inch-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-1552</link>
		<dc:creator>The Lazy Astronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/is-there-really-much-of-a-difference-between-an-8-inch-and-10-inch-telescope/#comment-1552</guid>
		<description>Yes - its a big difference.  It's all about aperture area (light gathering ability).  I found the biggest leap was 6" to 8" and the differences get smaller as size increases but 8" to 10" is still a big leap, particularly if you want to view diffuse objects.

I jumped 8" to 10" then to 14" for my asteroid work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes - its a big difference.  It&#8217;s all about aperture area (light gathering ability).  I found the biggest leap was 6&#8243; to 8&#8243; and the differences get smaller as size increases but 8&#8243; to 10&#8243; is still a big leap, particularly if you want to view diffuse objects.</p>
<p>I jumped 8&#8243; to 10&#8243; then to 14&#8243; for my asteroid work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: physicsguy89</title>
		<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/is-there-really-much-of-a-difference-between-an-8-inch-and-10-inch-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-1551</link>
		<dc:creator>physicsguy89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 06:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/is-there-really-much-of-a-difference-between-an-8-inch-and-10-inch-telescope/#comment-1551</guid>
		<description>youll get a better image with a 10 inch, but theres not too big of a difference   

i prefer the hubble</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>youll get a better image with a 10 inch, but theres not too big of a difference   </p>
<p>i prefer the hubble</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

