<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is this a good eyepiece for my telescope?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/is-this-a-good-eyepiece-for-my-telescope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/is-this-a-good-eyepiece-for-my-telescope/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 20:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: tham153</title>
		<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/is-this-a-good-eyepiece-for-my-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-1397</link>
		<dc:creator>tham153</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 15:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/is-this-a-good-eyepiece-for-my-telescope/#comment-1397</guid>
		<description>24mm eyepiece is well designed for what you want, and the focal length on the telescope is good also.  However, 4 inch aperture is rather small.  Don't expect Hubble quality photos!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>24mm eyepiece is well designed for what you want, and the focal length on the telescope is good also.  However, 4 inch aperture is rather small.  Don&#8217;t expect Hubble quality photos!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony W</title>
		<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/is-this-a-good-eyepiece-for-my-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-1396</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/is-this-a-good-eyepiece-for-my-telescope/#comment-1396</guid>
		<description>Yes. Sounds lovely!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. Sounds lovely!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eri</title>
		<link>http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/is-this-a-good-eyepiece-for-my-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-1395</link>
		<dc:creator>eri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telescopebuyingguide.com/blog/is-this-a-good-eyepiece-for-my-telescope/#comment-1395</guid>
		<description>A 24mm eyepiece is a good medium-range magnification - good for planets, clusters, larger galaxies, the Moon.  If I only had one eyepiece to work with, I'd go with 24 or 25mm.  As for the camera, hopefully this will work - but when I attached by camera (old SLR) to my old telescope, it attached directly to the back without an eyepiece.  So I'm having trouble picturing this arrangement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 24mm eyepiece is a good medium-range magnification - good for planets, clusters, larger galaxies, the Moon.  If I only had one eyepiece to work with, I&#8217;d go with 24 or 25mm.  As for the camera, hopefully this will work - but when I attached by camera (old SLR) to my old telescope, it attached directly to the back without an eyepiece.  So I&#8217;m having trouble picturing this arrangement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

